Efficacy of the Nance appliance as an anchorage-reinforcement method.

INTRODUCTION: The Nance appliance is widely considered to be an efficient method of anchorage reinforcement; however, much of the perceived advantage is based on clinical judgment. The aim of this study was to assess the amounts of anchorage loss and desired tooth movement associated with the Nance appliance. METHODS: The mandibular arches of 7 beagle dogs were used. The first and third premolars were extracted. Reference miniscrews were placed at the first premolar sites as stable references to measure the amounts of anchorage loss and desired tooth movement. Four beagles were fitted with custom-made Nance appliances on the fourth premolars and orthodontic bands on the second premolars (Nance group). Three beagles were fitted with orthodontic bands on the second and fourth premolars with no anchorage reinforcement (control group). The second premolars were retracted over 15 weeks in both groups. The amounts of second premolar movement (desired tooth movement) and fourth premolar movement (anchorage loss) were recorded at 5, 10, and 15 weeks. The percentages of desired tooth movement and anchorage loss to the total space closure were calculated. RESULTS: The mean desired tooth movement was significantly more in the Nance group than in the control group at 10 weeks (P <0.05) but was not significantly different at 5 and 15 weeks. The mean percentages of anchorage loss to the total space closure at 15 weeks were 45.7% in the control group and 28.8% in the Nance group. The Nance group had 16.9% less anchorage loss and 16.6% more desired tooth movement than did the control group at 15 weeks (P <0.05). Most of the anchorage loss (80%) in the Nance group occurred during the first 10 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The Nance appliance did not provide absolute anchorage, but there was significantly less anchorage loss with it than in the control group. The majority of anchorage loss occurred during the first 10 weeks in the Nance group.

The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.

AIM: To investigate the inter-examiner variability of contact point displacement measurements (used to calculate the overall Little's Irregularity Index (LII) score) from digital models of the maxillary arch by four independent examiners. METHODS: Maxillary orthodontic pre-treatment study models of ten patients were scanned using the Lava(tm) Chairside Oral Scanner (LCOS) and 3D digital models were created using Creo(®) computer aided design (CAD) software. Four independent examiners measured the contact point displacements of the anterior maxillary teeth using the software. Measurements were recorded randomly on three separate occasions by the examiners and the measurements (n=600) obtained were analysed using correlation analyses and analyses of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: LII contact point displacement measurements for the maxillary arch were reproducible for inter-examiner assessment when using the digital method and were highly correlated between examiner pairs for contact point displacement measurements >2mm. The digital measurement technique showed poor correlation for smaller contact point displacement measurements (<2mm) for repeated measurements. The coefficient of variation (CoV) of the digital contact point displacement measurements highlighted 348 of the 600 measurements differed by more than 20% of the mean compared with 516 of 600 for the same measurements performed using the conventional LII measurement technique. CONCLUSIONS: Although the inter-examiner variability of LII contact point displacement measurements on the maxillary arch was reduced using the digital compared with the conventional LII measurement methodology, neither method was considered appropriate for orthodontic research purposes particularly when measuring small contact point displacements.

Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?

OBJECTIVES: To compare contact point displacement measurements, used to determine the Little's Irregularity Index (LII) score on study casts and digital models of study casts by an independent examiner. METHODS: The contact point displacement measurements of the six maxillary anterior labial teeth were measured on ten study casts using digital callipers and their associated digital models using Creo Parametric software on five occasions following scanning using a LAVA Chairside Oral Scanner (LCOS) three-dimensional (3D) intra oral scanner. Means, standard deviations and coefficients of variation (CoV) were determined, data analyses (Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCCs) and Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)) and statistical analyses (three and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) and Independent Sample Student's t-tests) were carried out (p<0.05). RESULTS: Significant positive correlations for the contact point displacement measurements were evident between all measurement time points for the study casts (r>0.978; p<0.0001 and ICC>0.910; p<0.0001) and the digital models (r>0.963; p<0.0001 and ICC>0.986; p<0.0001). The CoV results showed that the contact point displacement measurement data from the digital models was more reproducible than the study casts. Of the 50 Independent Sample Student's t-tests, 21 significant increases (p<0.042) were reported in contact point displacement measurements <2.9 mm for the digital models compared with the study casts. CONCLUSION: The use of 3D digital models can improve the reliability of LII measurements by reducing the subjectivity associated with choosing the anatomic tooth contact points and the awkwardness of measuring the contact point displacements on study casts using a cumbersome calliper technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Intra-examiner variability in the measurement of LII is still evident with digital models suggesting that either improved software specifically aimed at the orthodontic community be identified or a new method for measuring anterior incisor crowding be sought.

Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: outdated and inaccurate?

OBJECTIVES: Little's Irregularity Index (LII) was devised to objectively score mandibular incisor alignment for epidemiological studies but has been extended to assess the relative performance of orthodontic brackets, retainer or treatment modalities. Our aim was to examine the repeatability and precision of LII measurements of four independent examiners on the maxillary arch of orthodontic patients. The hypothesis was that the reproducibility of individual contact point displacement measurements, used to calculate the LII score, are inappropriate. METHODS: The displacement of the anterior contact points, of the six upper labial segment teeth of the maxillary arch on each of ten casts, were randomly assessed by four examiners at three time-points using LII. RESULTS: Significant correlations were evident between the six examiner-pairs (r > 0.413; p < 0.001) for contact point displacements of >0.5 mm. The coefficients of variation showed that 516 of the 600 individual contact point displacement measurements differed by >20% of the mean. Analyses of variance revealed significant differences (p < 0.047) between examiners for 46% of the contact point displacement measurements. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of individual contact point displacement measurements, used to calculate the LII score, is poor such that using LII to assess the performance of orthodontic brackets, retainers or treatment modalities must emphatically be discouraged. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of LII by the orthodontic community to predictably determine the outcome of orthodontic treatment modalities in clinical practice cannot be advocated due to the limited accuracy and precision of the technique.

Orthodontic extrusion in the transitional dentition: a simple technique.

Extrusion of teeth may be necessary in cases of delayed eruption, primary retention, traumatically intruded teeth, or subgingivally fractured teeth. Removable appliances are advantageous, as anchorage is not as tooth-dependant as in the case of fixed appliances. They are cost-effective, operator friendly, and a valuable treatment option to consider in cases where extrusion of anterior teeth in the transitional dentition is necessary. The purpose of this paper was to describe a simple, cost-effective technique using a removable appliance for extrusion of incisors in the transitional dentition.